senoritafish: (pensive)
[Error: unknown template qotd]

Posted to Animated Adulthood (Gather.com):

NPR: Apple Visionary Steve Jobs dies at 56

While I'm more of a Microsoft user, I can't say I'm totally without influence by Steve Jobs creations, and I will not deny the world has lost a creative genius.  Steve Jobs is credited with being the first to make computers available to the average person, kickstarting the music download industry, and changing the way we purchase and listen to music.  As a family, we own several iPods of varying sizes (mostly older models, though), and I've been a user of iTunes for a number of years.  He also had a hand in getting what has become a large part of the movie industry started. 


In 1986, I was attending Humboldt State University, and was excited to get tickets to a two-day animation film festival, the second day of which was entirely computer animation.  It was extraordinarily expensive at the time - I believe I remember a quote of about $10,000 per hour of animation to produce, using very large supercomputers, so most of what existed then were shorts.  One of the shorts I saw then, sitting in the dark in a college auditorium, was by a new company (most of them were) of a large and a small desk lamp interacting - the large one acted as if it were a parent, while the small one hopped about, balanced on a ball and generally acted like a puppy.

 

According to NPR article above:

Jobs was eventually fired in a 1985 boardroom coup led by John Sculley — the man Jobs himself had hired to be CEO of Apple. But Jobs was driven to make computers vehicles for creativity, and after he left Apple, he purchased a little-known division of Lucas film and renamed it Pixar. In 1995, Pixar released the first animated feature to be done entirely on computers. That film, Toy Story, was a huge success, and Pixar followed it with other big hits including Monsters, Inc., The Incredibles and Finding Nemo.

(my emphasis added)

Luxo Jr., above, was nominated for an Academy Award in 1987 for best animated short and  later became part of Pixar's logo; he can be seen at the beginning of every Pixar movie, forming the "i" in the name.

While sometimes I complain about how some animation is "too" computer generated, Jobs set it on an inexorable path, and computer animation is now found in almost every kind of visual entertainment, sometimes where you might not even suspect it.

On Facebook, the Cartoon Art Museum in San Francisco quoted a statement by John Lasseter and Ed Catmull, Pixar's heads:

"Steve Jobs was an extraordinary visionary, our very dear friend and the guiding light of the Pixar family. He saw the potential of what Pixar could be before the rest of us, and beyond what anyone ever imagined. Steve took a chance on us and believed in our crazy dream of making computer animated films; the one thing he always said was to simply ‘make it great.’ He is why Pixar turned out the way we did and his strength, integrity and love of life has made us all better people. He will forever be a part of Pixar’s DNA. Our hearts go out to his wife Laurene and their children during this incredibly difficult time."

Good-bye, Mr. Jobs.  You'll be missed.



My mom passed away at the same age, 16 years ago.
senoritafish: (cfo no clue)
Me: (raising an eyebrow) You're playing Othello against a cotton candy eating Tyrannosaurus named Marvin?

Him: Yup. And losing. Badly.
senoritafish: (cfo no clue)
Me: (raising an eyebrow) You're playing Othello against a cotton candy eating Tyrannosaurus named Marvin?

Him: Yup. And losing. Badly.
senoritafish: (Ignore me!!!)
Well, crap, I missed yesterday. So much for the every day in July thing. The major obstacle is at least four people, sometimes five, competing for one PC at home. We try to set timers, and I regularly kick everyone off if there's something important I need to do (like pay bills), but still, there's a lot of squabbling. I really need to set aside some money to get my laptop fixed - it's been sitting since last summer (or was it the summer before? It has Vista on it, that should be a clue), but there just hasn't been enough extra to have it done. Ha. I should know there is never anything extra, especially this year with three furlough days a month, and everything else that needs fixing.

Gadget news - hey, the meme said your mundane life...  )
senoritafish: (Ignore me!!!)
Well, crap, I missed yesterday. So much for the every day in July thing. The major obstacle is at least four people, sometimes five, competing for one PC at home. We try to set timers, and I regularly kick everyone off if there's something important I need to do (like pay bills), but still, there's a lot of squabbling. I really need to set aside some money to get my laptop fixed - it's been sitting since last summer (or was it the summer before? It has Vista on it, that should be a clue), but there just hasn't been enough extra to have it done. Ha. I should know there is never anything extra, especially this year with three furlough days a month, and everything else that needs fixing.

Gadget news - hey, the meme said your mundane life...  )
senoritafish: (easily distracted silliness)
I get an email newsletter from a business IT website; most of its articles are way over my head as they're geared toward network managers of big companies - however, I keep it because every week they send me, along with the links to articles, something funny, usually a video, a quote, and a little this "day in history" blurb.
The quote this morning made me snigger for a couple of minutes:

"If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce would today cost $100, get a million miles per gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside."

- Robert X. Cringely, InfoWorld magazine


What can I say, I'm a bit sleep-deprived lately.
senoritafish: (easily distracted silliness)
I get an email newsletter from a business IT website; most of its articles are way over my head as they're geared toward network managers of big companies - however, I keep it because every week they send me, along with the links to articles, something funny, usually a video, a quote, and a little this "day in history" blurb.
The quote this morning made me snigger for a couple of minutes:

"If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce would today cost $100, get a million miles per gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside."

- Robert X. Cringely, InfoWorld magazine


What can I say, I'm a bit sleep-deprived lately.
senoritafish: (headdesk)
Odd. I got an email saying Millenium-Games.com wants to follow me on Twitter.

I don't have a Twitter account.

Granted, I follow several people on Twitter through Google Reader, and some people actually use it to post to their LJs. Occasionally like listening to one side of a phone conversation, but fun (as in this one, thank you [livejournal.com profile] angelsmum, that's hysterical) but I'm afraid I find restricting myself to 140 characters almost impossible. I may not talk much, but usually once I get typing...well, you can see this post already. It's the same reason I don't text much, probably, although I'll answer if someone sends me something.

Ah, I see that site has something to do with You-gi-oh! (sp?)card games - maybe something Angus signed up for in the past, before he had his own email.

I dunno, I haven't been posting here much lately either. Too much competition for the computer at home (we only have the one right now), and when I do get on, I spend more time reading than writing. I'm pretty boring lately, I'm afraid.
senoritafish: (headdesk)
Odd. I got an email saying Millenium-Games.com wants to follow me on Twitter.

I don't have a Twitter account.

Granted, I follow several people on Twitter through Google Reader, and some people actually use it to post to their LJs. Occasionally like listening to one side of a phone conversation, but fun (as in this one, thank you [livejournal.com profile] angelsmum, that's hysterical) but I'm afraid I find restricting myself to 140 characters almost impossible. I may not talk much, but usually once I get typing...well, you can see this post already. It's the same reason I don't text much, probably, although I'll answer if someone sends me something.

Ah, I see that site has something to do with You-gi-oh! (sp?)card games - maybe something Angus signed up for in the past, before he had his own email.

I dunno, I haven't been posting here much lately either. Too much competition for the computer at home (we only have the one right now), and when I do get on, I spend more time reading than writing. I'm pretty boring lately, I'm afraid.
senoritafish: (multitasking (doing the dishes))
skip if not a iPod user... )

(Btw, for more free music, the Amazon mp3 newsletter has at least 10 free songs every week, sometimes up to 20, all genres)
senoritafish: (multitasking (doing the dishes))
skip if not a iPod user... )

(Btw, for more free music, the Amazon mp3 newsletter has at least 10 free songs every week, sometimes up to 20, all genres)
senoritafish: (data laugh)
I'm amused to see my department's IT intranet page has a link to the Wikipedia entry on emoticons.

\ ^_^ /
senoritafish: (data laugh)
I'm amused to see my department's IT intranet page has a link to the Wikipedia entry on emoticons.

\ ^_^ /
senoritafish: (Default)
Grr. Spent a lot of day trying to figure out why the descriptions of a computer attached to a certain serial number weren't matching up. Our IT guy was looking at a fax I sent and, granted, while I don't have the neatest handwriting in the world, to be fair I also included the number in the original email I sent.

And is it just me, or does it seem like no one reads past the first paragraph? I always think people would prefer (and more polite of me) one email with several questions in it, rather than a barrage of them from me with one question each. But it seems like I only ever get an answer to my first question and no one reads any further, unless I email again and rattle their cages.

Anyway, sounds like we may have a new wetlab computer in the works. Our Access data entry program developed a glitch and we keep getting an error when the computer is supposed to open the ports to the bitpad and the balance, so we've been having to measure, weigh and enter our fish data by hand. After much searching for solutions and even having a few helpful people from UtterAccess.com give me clues, I gave up trying to fix it for free, and called the guy who wrote the program for help. He could come out to fix it, but after looking at the equipment - the computer is still Windows 98, and the bitpad is 12 years old?!? (but nevertheless a model you can still buy used) - the money might be better spent on an upgrade. Then we can spend his $100/hr. towards revamping the program instead of fixing the old version. Our time for processing samples is greatly slowed in the meantime, though. I was thinking a few hundred bucks might be worth it so it could at least be used until such time as the new equipment became available, but he says it could take 2-4 hrs. just to figure out what the problem was, before he could get to fixing it.

Ah well. I suppose it was overdue, anyway.
senoritafish: (Default)
Grr. Spent a lot of day trying to figure out why the descriptions of a computer attached to a certain serial number weren't matching up. Our IT guy was looking at a fax I sent and, granted, while I don't have the neatest handwriting in the world, to be fair I also included the number in the original email I sent.

And is it just me, or does it seem like no one reads past the first paragraph? I always think people would prefer (and more polite of me) one email with several questions in it, rather than a barrage of them from me with one question each. But it seems like I only ever get an answer to my first question and no one reads any further, unless I email again and rattle their cages.

Anyway, sounds like we may have a new wetlab computer in the works. Our Access data entry program developed a glitch and we keep getting an error when the computer is supposed to open the ports to the bitpad and the balance, so we've been having to measure, weigh and enter our fish data by hand. After much searching for solutions and even having a few helpful people from UtterAccess.com give me clues, I gave up trying to fix it for free, and called the guy who wrote the program for help. He could come out to fix it, but after looking at the equipment - the computer is still Windows 98, and the bitpad is 12 years old?!? (but nevertheless a model you can still buy used) - the money might be better spent on an upgrade. Then we can spend his $100/hr. towards revamping the program instead of fixing the old version. Our time for processing samples is greatly slowed in the meantime, though. I was thinking a few hundred bucks might be worth it so it could at least be used until such time as the new equipment became available, but he says it could take 2-4 hrs. just to figure out what the problem was, before he could get to fixing it.

Ah well. I suppose it was overdue, anyway.
senoritafish: (Default)
Cool! Use your >2GB of Gmail as a hard drive!

I have sent myself large files before, so I could access them from other computers, but this sounds like an easier way to do it. I think google wouldn't let me send certain types of files though (like *.exe ); I wonder if this would get around it? Except for the fact that it only works on IE...

(I've still got a ton of invites....)
senoritafish: (Default)
Cool! Use your >2GB of Gmail as a hard drive!

I have sent myself large files before, so I could access them from other computers, but this sounds like an easier way to do it. I think google wouldn't let me send certain types of files though (like *.exe ); I wonder if this would get around it? Except for the fact that it only works on IE...

(I've still got a ton of invites....)
senoritafish: (6yrsold)
We recently acquired two new computers for the use of our sci aides - and they came with flat panel LCD monitors! Since I have easily one of oldest monitors, VT thought it would be nice to swap out my computer's monitor with one of the new ones...

So I hooked it up this morning. It came with a USB cable, which baffled me for a moment; upon closer inspection, there's a hub on the side of monitor. And I had no idea there were that many dust bunnies breeding behind my old monitor.

Oh my, such a difference. It's better than the difference between days when I forget my glasses! The colors, so bright and sharp and prettiful...

You might want to cover your ears. I'm going to squee now.

EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!



(Hey, I don't do it that often. Some things call for it.)
senoritafish: (6yrsold)
We recently acquired two new computers for the use of our sci aides - and they came with flat panel LCD monitors! Since I have easily one of oldest monitors, VT thought it would be nice to swap out my computer's monitor with one of the new ones...

So I hooked it up this morning. It came with a USB cable, which baffled me for a moment; upon closer inspection, there's a hub on the side of monitor. And I had no idea there were that many dust bunnies breeding behind my old monitor.

Oh my, such a difference. It's better than the difference between days when I forget my glasses! The colors, so bright and sharp and prettiful...

You might want to cover your ears. I'm going to squee now.

EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!



(Hey, I don't do it that often. Some things call for it.)
senoritafish: (ray  troll: a 1000 words)
I have a Neil Finn CD (Try Whistling This) that I occasionally like to listen to in my computer at work. One annoyance with this CD is every time you put it in, it wants to install an ancient version of Earthlink. But that's fairly minor, and easily opted out of.

The big annoyance is I like to use WinAmp to listen to music, and it cannot find the tracks on this CD. (normally, I would just use Windows Media Player, as it has no problem finding them, but somethings haywire with it on this computer). Even if I look in Explorer, they don't show up.

The only way I can get this to play in WinAmp is if I put in another CD first (with the same or greater number of tracks), and then change the disks after it starts playing. WinAmp will then recognize the tracks, one at a time as they're played, titles and everything.

Weird. Was this some early form of copy-protection Sony was trying out? This album came out in 1998, and I know some CDs have come out recently that will not play in computers at all. If it is, it only works on this one media player.

'Spose I should post this in WinAmp's forums...

March 2016

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
131415 16171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 16th, 2025 05:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios