Dec. 10th, 2002

senoritafish: (Default)
My Garden club decided to do something different this year, and instead of our usual pot luck party, we went to a Holiday Concert at the local community college. Usually, this is a family thing, but John was a party-pooper because Carole was not going to cook her crown pork roast. We were supposed to meet at our President's house and wrap presents for our Project Self-Sufficiency family. This is a program for single moms trying to get off welfare, and they are usually going to school and working as well, and they often don't have much left over to get presents for their families. We adopt one every year.

I had a niggling feeling all day, that there was something I was supposed to be doing. Finally at about 6:30 it hit me that I was supposed to be over at Carole's. I called and arranged to meet them at the theater (I'll just have to give Ruth my present later). Gareth said he wanted to go and Angus eddied he wanted to as well. Even though Angus is older, he is a lot more wiggly, so I had some reservations. But in the end, I decided to take the chance that it wasn't sold out, and all three of us went. Ruth gave us two tickets and I had to buy another, and we sat at the end of the row so we wouldn't have to climb over everyone if we had to leave. Also, so wiggling wouldn't disturb anyone.

I had explained to them both before we went inside, that if they needed to talk to me they had to whisper. We looked at the program and I explained to them what all the different instruments were, and what they would see when the curtain went up. Each member of the band had a Xmas banner on the front of their music stand - some had angels, reindeer, and the conductor had one shaped like Santa, so it appeared Santa was holding up his podium. The conductor wore tails and a green waistcoat, and the announcer, who had a rather cheesy patter running through the whole thing, called him "Maestro." Gareth was rapt from the first moment the band began to play; Angus, however, slouched and kept trying to put his feet up on the seat, talk out loud, hum, and generally had a bit of trouble sitting still, although he liked the music. They especially enjoyed the "March of the Wooden Soldiers," where a bunch of little girls from the local ballet school, in soldier costumes, did a little dance number, and the at the end, when at lot of fake snow started falling out of the ceiling of the stage. They also liked the sing-along at the end too, although they didn't know the words. Overall, they behaved themselves pretty well, and we didn't have to leave at intermission, like I thought we might (I think the cookies at intermission helped). So the experiment was a success. Maybe we'll try a movie next.

I really need to go dig out my Christmas music.
senoritafish: (Default)
My Garden club decided to do something different this year, and instead of our usual pot luck party, we went to a Holiday Concert at the local community college. Usually, this is a family thing, but John was a party-pooper because Carole was not going to cook her crown pork roast. We were supposed to meet at our President's house and wrap presents for our Project Self-Sufficiency family. This is a program for single moms trying to get off welfare, and they are usually going to school and working as well, and they often don't have much left over to get presents for their families. We adopt one every year.

I had a niggling feeling all day, that there was something I was supposed to be doing. Finally at about 6:30 it hit me that I was supposed to be over at Carole's. I called and arranged to meet them at the theater (I'll just have to give Ruth my present later). Gareth said he wanted to go and Angus eddied he wanted to as well. Even though Angus is older, he is a lot more wiggly, so I had some reservations. But in the end, I decided to take the chance that it wasn't sold out, and all three of us went. Ruth gave us two tickets and I had to buy another, and we sat at the end of the row so we wouldn't have to climb over everyone if we had to leave. Also, so wiggling wouldn't disturb anyone.

I had explained to them both before we went inside, that if they needed to talk to me they had to whisper. We looked at the program and I explained to them what all the different instruments were, and what they would see when the curtain went up. Each member of the band had a Xmas banner on the front of their music stand - some had angels, reindeer, and the conductor had one shaped like Santa, so it appeared Santa was holding up his podium. The conductor wore tails and a green waistcoat, and the announcer, who had a rather cheesy patter running through the whole thing, called him "Maestro." Gareth was rapt from the first moment the band began to play; Angus, however, slouched and kept trying to put his feet up on the seat, talk out loud, hum, and generally had a bit of trouble sitting still, although he liked the music. They especially enjoyed the "March of the Wooden Soldiers," where a bunch of little girls from the local ballet school, in soldier costumes, did a little dance number, and the at the end, when at lot of fake snow started falling out of the ceiling of the stage. They also liked the sing-along at the end too, although they didn't know the words. Overall, they behaved themselves pretty well, and we didn't have to leave at intermission, like I thought we might (I think the cookies at intermission helped). So the experiment was a success. Maybe we'll try a movie next.

I really need to go dig out my Christmas music.
senoritafish: (Default)
I only read Miss Manners on Sundays, which is the only day we get the paper. This is probably a good thing, as I usually feel fairly chatised after I read her column. One of her advice comments struck me as funny though (and it's quite typical that I finally get to reading some of the Sunday paper on Tuesday):

Dear Miss Manners: When finger food and/or other appetizers are served at a social gathering, what is the proper way to eat them?

I usually take a small napkin and grab the item. What I see is 99 percent of the guests simply grabbing ithe item with the hand, one after the other. It's disgusting. Is it me, or do I need to relax and enjoy the food?

I found her her rather cynical reply amusing.
Gentle Reader: It's you. You missed something.

Take a deep breath, but before you relax, take a look at the term you used to describe those appetizers: finger food. Does this contain a clue about the proper way to eat it?

You may not choose to do so. Miss Manners has no objection to fastidiousness. What she does find objectionable is showing others that you find their unexceptional manners disgusting and the merest hint of their touch lethal. Your method heavily suggests that, so you may want to bypass the appetizers, especially if you reflect on what human contact may have gone into their preparation.


I think the idea is grabbing one piece with the fingers, so the others remain untouched. I suppose there is a fair amount of overlap, but I think your immune system can probably handle it. It needs exercise anyway. If you trust your host to invite people with decent hygiene, you probably don't have much to worry about.

This person sounds like a woman at work who will not touch a doorknob with her bare hands. She goes around all day with a pocketful of Kleenex. And yet she smokes like a chimney. (shaking head) I just don't see the point.
senoritafish: (Default)
I only read Miss Manners on Sundays, which is the only day we get the paper. This is probably a good thing, as I usually feel fairly chatised after I read her column. One of her advice comments struck me as funny though (and it's quite typical that I finally get to reading some of the Sunday paper on Tuesday):

Dear Miss Manners: When finger food and/or other appetizers are served at a social gathering, what is the proper way to eat them?

I usually take a small napkin and grab the item. What I see is 99 percent of the guests simply grabbing ithe item with the hand, one after the other. It's disgusting. Is it me, or do I need to relax and enjoy the food?

I found her her rather cynical reply amusing.
Gentle Reader: It's you. You missed something.

Take a deep breath, but before you relax, take a look at the term you used to describe those appetizers: finger food. Does this contain a clue about the proper way to eat it?

You may not choose to do so. Miss Manners has no objection to fastidiousness. What she does find objectionable is showing others that you find their unexceptional manners disgusting and the merest hint of their touch lethal. Your method heavily suggests that, so you may want to bypass the appetizers, especially if you reflect on what human contact may have gone into their preparation.


I think the idea is grabbing one piece with the fingers, so the others remain untouched. I suppose there is a fair amount of overlap, but I think your immune system can probably handle it. It needs exercise anyway. If you trust your host to invite people with decent hygiene, you probably don't have much to worry about.

This person sounds like a woman at work who will not touch a doorknob with her bare hands. She goes around all day with a pocketful of Kleenex. And yet she smokes like a chimney. (shaking head) I just don't see the point.
senoritafish: (6yrsold)
My kids are so weird. They refuse to eat normal food (except for junk) but will eat things like kippers and cornichons, those ultra-sour little pickles from Trader Joe's.
senoritafish: (6yrsold)
My kids are so weird. They refuse to eat normal food (except for junk) but will eat things like kippers and cornichons, those ultra-sour little pickles from Trader Joe's.
senoritafish: (Default)
The Word of the Day for December 10 is:

marmoreal \mahr-MOR-ee-ul\ (adjective)
: of, relating to, or suggestive of marble or a marble
statue especially in coldness or aloofness

Example sentence:
William surveyed Agnes with marmoreal coolness, his
features rigid and disapproving.

Did you know?
Most marble-related words in English were chiseled from
the Latin noun "marmor," meaning "marble." "Marmor" gave our
language the word "marble" itself in the 12th century. It is
also the parent of "marmoreal," which has been used in English
since the mid-1600s. "Marbleize," another "marmor" descendant,
came later, making its print debut around 1859.

----------------
Brought to you by Merriam-Webster, Inc.
senoritafish: (Default)
The Word of the Day for December 10 is:

marmoreal \mahr-MOR-ee-ul\ (adjective)
: of, relating to, or suggestive of marble or a marble
statue especially in coldness or aloofness

Example sentence:
William surveyed Agnes with marmoreal coolness, his
features rigid and disapproving.

Did you know?
Most marble-related words in English were chiseled from
the Latin noun "marmor," meaning "marble." "Marmor" gave our
language the word "marble" itself in the 12th century. It is
also the parent of "marmoreal," which has been used in English
since the mid-1600s. "Marbleize," another "marmor" descendant,
came later, making its print debut around 1859.

----------------
Brought to you by Merriam-Webster, Inc.

March 2016

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
131415 16171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 11th, 2026 07:27 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios